Stepping back.....

Too frequently conflict with others or within ourselves comes from being too close, too involved, in a situation or event. 'Stepping back' from the situation can often reveal aspects not otherwise considered or seen.

Name:
Location: Tennessee, United States

An ear for all my friends who don't have any.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

What you sow, so shall you reap

So easy to send someone else into war.
Equally easy are drive-by shootings.

Is there a link?

People in high places consider other human
life as a means to an end.
Pleople in low places consider other human
life as a means to an end.
And the end justifies the means.

Who leads, who follows?

Those of us in the middle consider human
life as a value, without which everything
else is of no consequence.
The means justifies the end.

What you sow is what you will reap.
What you believe is what you will experience.

Peace

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

A Win-Win Oil Glut Solution?

One can only say this in so many ways before
one gives up.
Recent article:

"Political tensions must ease for oil to fall: Opec

The anxiety in the market is so great that Iran’s OPEC
governor Hossein Kazempour Ardebili said the cartel was
unlikely to cut production when it meets June 1, despite
an apparent oil glut.

'In opening the largely closed-door workshop (a joint
OPEC-International Energy Agency workshop on demand)
in the Norwegian capital of Oslo, Mr Barkindo said
“there is absolutely no supply shortage.” '

“Remove the impediment of geopolitical concerns, tensions,
and the resulting speculation and the oil price will find
its rightful place in the market,” said Mr Barkindo.

Mr Ardebili also said there appeared to be an excess
supply of 1.2m barrels of oil per day for the April
through June period."

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1539530.cms

So, why do we still have high prices at the pump?

Because the existing refineries are processing more
foreign oil than U.S. oil, and people in the futures
market are controlling the per-barrell price based
on, or so they say, fear of whatever the wind blows
up today. Actually, they are just riding a recently
discovered "high". This is evidenced by the variety
of reasons given for maintaining and pushing the
per barrel price higher and higher.

President Bush is suggesting that new oil refineries
be built on abandonded military complexes. That would
certainly provide an economic boost to some areas that
felt the pinch when the bases were closed.

What I am not finding in these suggestions or
considerations by the President or Congress is the
proprietary end of these possible new refineries.

Since the oil companies decided in the 70's to forego
the building of new refineries and turned over the
majority of their processing capacity to foreign oil,
it just doesn't seem fair or right to anyone
concerned to give them access to any military
'base-ed' refinery. Their profits in the last couple
of years hasn't given them the impetus to see a need
for new refineries as any adventurous entrepreneur
would, so let them continue with what they have. They
certainly don't need any new incentives, concessions,
or encouragement from Congress. Let them run their
business as they have seen and continue to see, fit.

I would suggest, as the President is prone to do,
the use of the military for this construction. It
could very well be an educational process for both
the military and the country.

To even consider that the existing oil companies
be a necessary part of new refineries would be
a major mistake. It would keep the process within
the hands of the few who have helped us into the
current situation and little would be changed
except the existing oil companies experiencing
more benefits of non-invested sweat equity or
money.

As with many other countries, a refinery OWNED
by the people of the United States would be an
impetus for the people to become more involved
in their use of their resources. I would daresay
that every owner or user of an automobile in
the United States would gladly and willingly
give $1.00, or more, out-of-pocket, for a piece
of and for the building of such a refinery.

New, military base refineries could take up the
slack in what the current U.S. Oil Cartel of
Companies are not producing from current supplies
of U.S. oil.
New, military base refineries could also funnel off
a very small percentage of its production FROM DAY
ONE into a 'reserve bank' for future problem periods.
Sales of processed oil would go toward paying off
the construction of a refinery and then the national
debt.

The military as builders and partners, but
non-owners, of the day-to-day operations could also
give an added bonus in Research and Development of
more efficient fuels, both for military use and for
consumer use.

As my suggestion is a win-win proposition, though
not without some problems to be ironed out, it
is doubtful that any of it will be adopted by
anyone. However, I will point out that to build
a refinery by the military would involve less
logistics and expense than a war.

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

REGISTERING to read an internet newspaper?!

To Whom It May Concern:

Accessing your website via the internet, I was
somewhat surprised to read that in order to continue
to a page beyond the front page, I had to BECOME A
REGISTERED USER with your website.

Believing that turn-around is fair play, and
following the lead of many newspaper registration
forms, in order for your newspaper to be read by me,
your paper will be required to BECOME A REGISTERED
NEWS PROVIDER. Therefore, here, based on combined
forms from various internet newspapers, is the
registration process:
_________________________________________

BECOME A REGISTERED NEWS PROVIDER

PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO TELL ME ABOUT YOURSELF!

By completing this simple one-time
registration (but if you are repeatedly
asked to register with me, CLICK HERE so
that I can help you), you'll gain instant
access to my mental demographics and
interactive reading habits (as they do change
daily).

Concerned about privacy? I understand.
However, while not ignoring but simultaneously
ignoring the definition of "privacy,"
some of the following questions are
very personal. Please be assured that I
respect your privacy and will safeguard
your personal information by keeping it on
my computer. Please understand that your
personal information will occasionally be
open to hackers or members of my family
as well as friends of members of my
family who are not authorized to gather
information.

Wondering why I've asked you to register?
Your registering will help me improve my
reading skills and better understand what
you have written. For more information
about registration, CLICK OVER THERE.

*'d fields indicate a Required Field.

1. Please set up your account information.
(OK, so I've changed 'registration' to
'account.' Not to worry. At this point, no
money is required. [Pay no attention to
the man behind the curtain.])

PRIVACY NOTICE
I never intentionally share your personal
information with third parties without your
explicit permission.
You won't receive communication from anyone
other than myself or my Website as a result
of registering with me, but those
communications may be on any subject
I deem worthy. Read my PRIVACY POLICY.

*Name ______________________________________

*E-mail Address ____________________________

*Confirm E-mail Address_____________________

*Please confirm the confirmation____________

*Create A Password__________________________

*Confirm Password___________________________

Confirm the confirmation of your password___

*Gender SELECT__ Confirm SELECTION___
Send picture

*Birth Year SELECT __ Prove it! __
Send Birth Certificate, with Social Security
and Drivers License Numbers.

*Mailing Address____________________________

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

*City______________________ *State _________

*County ____________________________________
UNITED STATES

*Zip Code __________________________________

Telephone __________________________________
(You can either fill in the telephone number
or we can look it up, your choice.)

Does your Email allow for HTML? ___________
(Not that I am going to flood your email with
anything, right?)

2. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Select your favorite hobbies or
interests on which you base articles to
appear in your newspaper. Make as many
selections as you like. Note: The primary
reason I ask this question is to better
organize my reading habits.

Automotive __
Automotive Competitions __
Accurate Attributions __
Boating __
Boating competitions __
Books/Literature __
News People Creating News __
Computers/Technology __
ISP Competitions __
Cooking __
Cook-offs __
Corrections __
Decorating __
Entertainment/Movies __
Fris-tianity__
Gardening __
Gay Bashing __
Black Bashing __
Bubba Bashing __
Golf __
Golf Competitions __
Health and Fitness __
Home Electronics __
Home Improvement __
Internet/Computer Games __
Investigative Reporting __
Indepth Interviews and Reporting __
Inflamatory Reporting __
Interpretations to fit your agenda __
Literal reporting __
Reporting Competitions __
Music __
Money __
Making Money __
Making Lots of Money __
Manipulating the News __
Non-biased Interpretation of Events __
Outdoor Activities __
Politically Biased Reporting __
Political Rhetoric __
Prejudicial Subjects __
Prison Executions ___
Drive-by Executions ___
Home Executions ___
See-Me Events __
Shallow Investigative Reporting __
Shopping __
Slightly Altered Interpretations __
Sports __
Sports Facts __
Sports Statistics __
Sports Chum __
Stock Market/Finance __
Stock Market Gambling __
Summary Reporting __
Travel __
Vanity Events __
War and its entertainment value __
Who wore what __
Who married who __
Who divorced who __


To registered newspapers, I will offer, from
time-to-time, valuable advice and brilliant
observations of my city-county-state-country-
world operations, or lack thereof, and of
businesses within my community. This
registration will assist me in the focus of
such commentary.

Typically, how do you distribute your
newspaper? Do you give-away copies of your
daily publication? Do you confer free
subscriptions on randomly picked
residents?
Are these free subscriptions and
distrubutions considered as part of your
circulation figures?
Are your advertising prices based on
these combined circulation figures?

Do you require Newpapers through Vending
Machine buyers to Become Registered Users?
Readers at the Public Library?
Buyers at convenience stores, grocery
stores or other Retail Outlets?


What was your profit for the year
2003? ________________
2004? ________________
2005? ________________


This registration will only be required
of newspapers that want me to apply my
reading skills to their efforts,
regardless of their distribution methods
or profit motives.
Newspapers that are available only
through vending machines or free
subscriptions will also be required to
become Registered Newspapers.

Until such time as this registration
form has been received and approved by
me, all links to your newspaper site
have been removed from my computer.

I look forward to becoming an avid
reader, commentator, complainer and
well-wisher for your Newspaper.
Accepted registrants will be notified
via email, eventually.

Monday, May 08, 2006

Throw more money! Throw more money!

YAHOO! News
By Andy Sullivan, REUTERS
Tue May 2, 6:45 PM ET $100 gas rebate "insulting,"
Boehner says


"Senate Republicans proposed the $100 rebate last week
in a package that also included incentives to build
refineries and open up the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge for drilling."


Prompts An Open letter to the United States Senate

To Whom It May, or May Not, Concern:

Republican Ladies-Gentlemen. Seeing the above quoted
paragraph in the news article seems to provide one
explanation of how our country 'just happens' to be
where it is rather than where it needs to be.

The Republican Senators' proposals (above) demonstrates
a definite lack of knowledge of figures that are in the
public domain and readily available and shows beyond a
shadow of a doubt that the opening of the Artic National
Wildlife Refuge is a case of overkill. It also
demonstrates our Congresses' penchant for throwing money,
in some form or another, at all problems, with as little
thought involved as possible.

The proposal of incentives for building more refineries
is, at best, stomach wrenching. They are willing to do
this for the mega-giant corporations (God only knows,
they need it! Right?).
[You do see how this works, don't you? They take away
a tax break here and a tax break there and then give
it back via "incentives" (aka, tax breaks) in another
area.]
Yet, for many struggling Mom & Pop businesses, a bank,
their only option, would rather put them through thirty
degrees of mirrors and geek speak or see them eat dirt
rather than let go of any of their monetary reserves.

Perhaps Mom & Pop should take a little trip to Washington.

If the profit being made on the oil that they process
is not enough for the oil companies to see the value
in spending their own money to build additional refineries,
it isn't the people's responsibility to help them out.
They are certainly not helping us out.
Besides, at this point in time, according to the EIA
website, the refineries cannot process all of the oil
that arrives at their doors each day anyway, even
just the USA oil. That being the case, what is the point
of pumping more oil out of the Artic National Wildlife
Refuge just to dump it at the doors of the refineries
and let it sit there while foreign oil gets processed?

Sunday, May 07, 2006

The Invisible Ball-and-Chain!

Recently, I was shopping in a small store of various
merchandise in equally various departments. Checking
out what might be available on the book shelves, I
heard someone come up behind me and stop. Thinking
that perhaps I needed to make room for the person,
I turned to see at what area they were looking and
could I accomodate them by a step to the left or
right.

However, upon turning, I realized that the lady was
not as close as I thought. She was standing about
five feet from me, in the middle of the area, facing
in my general direction. I noticed that she was
dialing a number on her cell phone. Then I heard her
side of the conversation. It went something like this:

"Hey."
"Where are you?"
"I'm over here in the book section."
"No, it's where the miscellaneous items are."
"Yeah."
"Well, just turn to your right."
"No. Look to your right. I see you."
"Yeah, here I am."

At that moment a man came walking up to her, also
on a cell phone. It was then I realized that the
two of them were talking to each other. In this
small store!

I smiled as I realized that a rope tied to his leg
would have been a lot cheaper than two cell phones
and would have probably caused a lot more heads to
turn to see what in the world was going on. Or, to
put it another way, the 'see-me' factor would have
risen ten-fold.

I wonder if they do this when entertaining in their
home. He, keeping the guests entertained out on the
patio. She, in the kitchen getting another bottle of
wine.
Her cell phone rings.

"Hello."
"More dip? Ok."
"Yeah."
"I'll bring it right out."

Or, how about this:

She-working in the flower bed. He-taking a nap in
front of the tv's afternoon football game. His cell
phone rings.

"Hello."
"Yeah, I'm awake, why?"
"Well, how much do you need?"
"Where in the garage?"
"The blue bag with the yellow label?"
"Ok. I'll bring it right out."

Or, maybe this:

He-at the dining table. His cell phone rings.

"Hello."
"Oh, it's you."
"Sweetheart, you're just at the other end of the table."
"Yeah, it's fun."
"The peas?"
"I'll slide them over to you. Catch."

Or:

She, reading in bed. He, curled up on
the other side of the bed. Her cell phone
rings.

"Yeah."
"But honey, I've only got one more chapter."
"Yeah, I'll get one tomorrow."
"Ok, ok! I'll turn it off!"

Friday, May 05, 2006

My Big Fat Compost Heap

An odd scene drove past me the other day on
my way to work.

I was sitting at a side street, waiting to enter
a major thoroughfare when this car drove by
me.
Well, the back passenger door on the drivers
side was all overly-swaddled in duct tape.
Obviously the window had been knocked out by
a thief, or the owner because all the
doors were locked and the keys were still
in the ignition.
The window is what caught my attention. The
duct tape has a nice sheen when hit by sunlight.
The driver was very unconcerned as she drove
by, talking on her cell phone.
My immediate thought was of priorities. We do
have to keep those in order, don't we?

How did we get here? How did we arrived at
this point in time when the only thing that
makes sense is me? Don't you agree? Aren't
you the only person that makes sense to you?

Why hasn't someone done a time-line book on
stupidity? I would also like to see one on
contradictions. I think the history of those
two concepts would be very interesting.

Like the duct taped automobile, we can always
do exactly what we've done in the past, we
can stick a band-aid on the problem. We never
seem to have solutions anymore, just band-aids,
coverups, temporary feel-better-for-now's.
We're much too busy to try to arrive at a
solution. Let someone else worry about that.
Other people get paid a hell of a lot more
than I do to solve these problems.
The fact that they often make matters
worse is immaterial. At least they are trying.
You know, sort of like a doctor who tells you,
"Take this medicine, and if that doesn't work,
we'll try something else."

DO WHAT?

Or the weatherman on television when he says,
"Today there will be a 40% chance of rain."
Can't you just see the side glances going all
around the room if the weatherman had said
"Today, there will be a 60% chance of no rain."
You would probably be wondering why he even
bothered to say that. If he reported the weather
that way, he really wouldn't have much of
anything to talk about during his allotted time
on the air, in your living room, in your face,
would he?
So, in reality, the smallest chance of anything
will be your weather today.
Try stepping out the back door, do you feel a
cool breeze or a cold wind (and why not a cool
wind or a cold breeze)? Chances are, you will
need a jacket. Glance up at the sky. Is it
cloudy? Take the umbrella, just in case.

What has all of this to do with where we are
today?
Simple. Linguistic whitewash. We are continually
distancing ourselves from everything by merely
changing our language. By changing the language,
we change our views. By changing our views, we
change our beliefs about things. The fact that
this is backwards and contradictory is immaterial.

For example: the war in Iraq.
We have young men, and some not so young, over
there putting their lives at risk. Some are
giving up their lives and their futures. They
are pumped and primed to engage in battle. They
are willing to kill another human being if given
an order to do so. And it's ok.
If they do manage to come home in one piece, they
return to a country and an environment which says
it is illegal to kill someone (hint, hint)! But
we expect these young people to kill someone (for
us) in a foreign country and then to 'just put
that behind them' and get on with their lives
upon their return.
How do you forget that you have killed another
human being?
How do you forget this when every day you pick
up a newspaper and read about someone being
arrested for either killing someone, or a gang
kills someone in a rival gang, or a husband has
his wife 'knocked off' by hiring someone to do
what he can't, or a boy goes on a shooting
rampage in a school? When caught, they have been
arrested because killing is illegal. Period.
But then, we can turn around and have 'that
killer' killed by the state, and that's legal!
Logical conclusion: it is ok to kill... for some,
but not for others, it just depends on who does
the killing and why. Killing can be both illegal
and legal. And we turn to ....(who?) to determine
who can kill and when?

And, as if that weren't enough with which to
contend, we then get into the obvious fact that
human life isn't worth a dime. This is proven
by the fact of so many gang killings, road rage
killings, people 'going postal', so to speak, and
of course, people who WANT to kill themselves and
as many as possible with them when they become
embroiled in some fanatics ego-dream and lust for
power. Life in this reality just isn't what its
cracked up to be, is it? After all, we have very
prominent philosophers and people in high places
telling us that our bodies are comparable to
machines, occasionally needing some mechanical
repair. A machine. Machines don't have quality
of life, do they? Ever see a machine produce a
baby machine, care for it, nurture it? Of course
not. So, where did this idea of us being
comparable to machines come from? The media.

Some stupid reporter picked up on an analysis
given as an example by a doctor or researcher
to explain a point and the reporter ran a
touchdown by conveniently dropping part of the
report. This 'machine' aspect became his point-
of-focus, not the entire report. Another
reporter picked up on his article and scored
still another touchdown with an assertion
bordering on "fact" in still another article.
Soon, everyone is spouting the same garbage
as if it were common knowledge!
People, it isn't.
The media is also who bring you wars, murder
and any other tabloid reporting of the
things that are possible for one human to do
to another, the meaner the better. People see
this on television, tell their friends who tune
in to see someone die (watching grandpa die
wasn't very exciting, was it?), television
ratings go up, obviously this is what the
public wants, film more gore, more people
watch, ratings go up, more gore on the news,
more people watch...... And this ends....
where? When a bigger event occurs that can
create more misery and misfortune, like a
volcano, a psunami, a hurricane or an
earthquake. The media, in one more gaffe of
misjudgement, mistakes the publics search
for knowledge and information with its ability
to present horror, blood, murder and
misfortune.

But a lot of pictures or footage and a little
bit of text is so much easier, and profitable.

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Mixed signals. What! Me Worry?

First this:

YAHOO! News, May 1, 2006, Associated Press release

"Bush Says Health Care Costs Unacceptable

WASHINGTON - President Bush said Monday health care costs
are rising at an unacceptably fast pace and he called on
Congress to enact White House proposals to tame medical
expenses."

and then this:

YAHOO! News, Mon May 1, Associated Press release

Administration Has No Magic Gas Price Fix

WASHINGTON - President Bush's new chief of staff said
Sunday that the White House plan to address high
gasoline prices will have only a modest impact and the
ultimate goal must to be reducing dependence on
foreign oil."

Can anyone make any sense of this? It sounds like we
should either reduce our dependence on health care
costs or Congress will start lowering the price of
a gallon of gas at the pump, is that right? Is that
what this means?

Our NEW Foreign Policy

On YAHOO! News
Cheney Lectures Russia About Reform

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
May 04, 2006

"No legitimate interest is served when oil and gas
become tools of intimidation or blackmail, either by
supply manipulation or attempts to monopolize
transportation," he said. (Quoting Cheney)

Hint, Hint. HINT, HINT. HINT!, HINT!

"...either by supply manipulation..."

The way your gas at the pump keeps getting more and
more expensive, maybe?

You've been reading about this here, if you have managed
to find this blog, but I doubt you will find any follow-
up on it in any major media.

This criticism may have been directed at Putin but it
is also directed at the United States, as do other
remarks in this article; many of which strains logic
and understanding to the maximum. For instance:

"from religion and the news media to advocacy groups
and political parties, the government has unfairly and
improperly restricted the rights of the people."

"Other actions "have been counterproductive and could
begin to affect relations with other countries," Cheney
said, mentioning energy and border issues."

"And no one can justify actions that undermine the
territorial integrity of a neighbor, or interfere with
democratic movements."

Mr. Cheney, these remarks should be turned back
onto the Bush administration, of which you are a part,
and test their merits before pointing fingers at
foreign entities.

Our new foreign policy--Don't do as we do, do as we say.