How did Hussein beat bin Laden into Court?

Several years back, I told the people in a Yahoo Group
that it is possible that electing G.W.Bush as President
may be the best thing this country has done. I based that
on the presumption that he, Bush, will probably be the
best example, by word and deed, of showing this country
just how easily this country can be lead down a path of
near-total corruption and destruction, much like Nazi
Germany, much like Enron. It is possible that he, better
than anyone else, will bring into focus this country's
pursuit of the dollar and "me-ism" [as if money were
the end-all and not the means to an end, and the 'me'
was in a race to accumulate more of it than all of the
other "me's" in the world] before it realizes that this
experiment is not going in a direction we as a nation
particularly relish.

Ironically, I see a government being run pretty much as
the corporation Enron, according to Eichenwald's book
Conspiracy of Fools, i.e., a government bent on creating
its own rules without giving any thought, understanding
or concern as to why the old rules were put in place.

"WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney shrugged off
congressional criticism of the Bush administration's
domestic eavesdropping program Tuesday...

He also expressed little interest in working with
Congress to settle legal disputes."

Shades of Enron!

So, in listening to a morning radio talk show, I was
struck with a question posed as to why Bush didn't get
the FISA rules changed to make wiretapping, etc.,
legal when he was presented with the opportunity .
I think, actually, the answer was given in that same
broadcast. It is such that should a case ever be
brought up about prosecuting someone based on evidence
gathered via an illegal action on the part of law
enforcement, that evidence would not be allowed in a
courtroom.

VOILA!

There is your answer. The logical conclusion is
that the survelliance and wiretapping is not being
done solely for the purpose of gathering information
strictly on terrorists and terrorists related
activities, and such ulterior purposes could easily
come to light in a court of law.

"In an address last October, Bush said the United
States and its allies had foiled at least 10 serious
plots by the al-Qaida terror network in the last
four years, including plans for Sept. 11-like attacks
on both U.S. coasts."

Note the use of the word "foiled." The article from
which this quote was taken, even though lengthy,
only mentions one case of someone being arrested
and being held for prosecution. And the other nine?
Good luck on finding that information.

So, it is not now and never has been the intention
of the Bush government to actually prosecute and jail
terrorists!
It is not now and never has been the intention of the
Bush administration to find and prosecute ben Laden!

Witness:

Remarks by the President After Two Planes Crash Into
World Trade Center - Emma Booker Elementary School -
Sarasota, Florida 9:30 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: "Ladies and gentlemen, this is a
difficult moment for America.
Today we've had a national tragedy. Two airplanes
have crashed into the World Trade Center in an
apparent terrorist attack on our country. I have
spoken to... and have ordered that the full resources
of the federal government go to help the victims
and their families, and to conduct a full-scale
investigation to hunt down and to find those folks
who committed this act. Terrorism against our nation
will not stand." -White House (9/11/01)

Presidential Response, Barksdale Air Force Base near
Shreveport, Louisiana, September 11, 2001 12:36 P.M. EDT
"Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless
coward and freedom will be defended. I want to reassure
the American people that the full resources of the federal
government are working to assist local authorities to save
lives and to help the victims of these attacks. Make no
mistake: The United States will hunt down and punish those
responsible for these cowardly acts."

Statement by the President in His Address to the Nation
8:30 P.M. EDT
"The search is underway for those who are behind these evil
acts. I've directed the full resources of our intelligence
and law enforcement communities to find those responsible
and to bring them to justice. We will make no distinction
between the terrorists who committed these acts and those
who harbor them."
["...and those who harbor them." hint, hint.
Was this our first indication that it had already
been decided that we were going to war with Iraq, a
country later described as 'harboring terrorists.']

Yet:
-- President George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and
really don't care. It's not that important. It's not
our priority."

This administration that makes extensive use of 'it may'
and 'it might' and 'what if.' So, should an actual occurance
of those mights and mays ever come into being and be
tried in the field of reality, the House of Maybe would
be seen for exactly what it is, a created scenario
simply for the furtherance of those who prey on confusion,
created by themselves. The plan has been there all along...
make a new reality based on what you want it to be!

The war on Iraq and the war on terrorism were created
by the Bush administration. They created it based on a
lie and now they must support the original lie with
another lie, and with another, and another, etc.
We all know how this works. We did it as children,
until we learned that it doesn't work. But this is what
the Bush administration is doing in order to support it.
In turn, it makes THEM essential to the running of this
country according to their new policies using their new
rules (see Conspiracy of Fools).

Yet not one initiative with anything near the weight of
the dollars and number of people that have been provided
for the war in Iraq or terrorism has been made to
bring other oppressive and bloodletting governments to
their knees in Africa or anywhere else in the world.
Why?

Nor has the amount of effort to stop the spread and use
of cocaine and other drugs from entering this country
been expended as has been spent on the effort to bring
a rather odd definition of democracy to just one country
in the middle east.
Why?

Nor has any amount of money nearing the halfway mark for
the war in Iraq been spent to solve the emmigration
problem that is, in fact, at our borders.
Why?

Nor has an equal amount of effort been expended to find
Osama ben Laden, the confessed instigator of 9/11, and
bring him to justice as has been spent in bringing
Hussein, a 'may be,' a 'could be,' a 'might be,'
'possible' threat, to a court of law.
Why?

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and
really don't care. It's not that important. It's not
our priority."
-- President George W. Bush, March 13, 2002

And if terror against the U.S. in order to bring about
change was the goal of ben Laden, why has he been
underground and quiet for so long? Was he really just
a one-time shooting star? Has his role been played out
to its end and he is now behind the scenes helping
with the props?

And if justice, by Bush's definition, is a goal, why has
he been so lax in pursuing Public Enemy No. 1, the one
person who could create another 9/11-type event at any
time?

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and
really don't care. It's not that important. It's not
our priority."
-- President George W. Bush, March 13, 2002

Why is President Bush, instead of relentlessly pursuing
ben Laden with the blinding zeal of someone intent on
extracting justice, only adding to the deaths of 9/11
with an additional 2000+ soldiers killed in Iraq, and
more being added daily?

Shouldn't he be saying "Enough is enough. Either win
this thing or come home!"?

How did Hussein beat bin Laden into court?